Buffalo Regional Right to Life

Donate here to help save the babies.

Because of Buffalo Regional Right to Life's tax-exempt status under IRC Sec. 501(C)(4) and its state and federal legislative activities, contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions (IRC § 170) or as business deductions (IRC § 162(e)(1)). 

Eternal Father, I offer Thee the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ along with all of the instruments of His Holy Passion and Crucifixion that Thou may put division into the ranks of our enemies because a kingdom divided against itself cannot stand.

 in thePrayer given to:

Sr. Marie de St. Pierre
 1840's against Revolutionary Men ,
presented by John Vennari in a talk about the  Politics of Saul Alinsky and how Obama is trained in the Alinsky methods.

It is so galling.  The Republicans in Congress are cutting the adoption tax credit, but they are funding Planned Parenthood.

We need to stop them.  
Here is a fact.  It costs the federal government more to help states care for children in foster care and orphanages each year than it does to give the adoption tax credit.  The tax credit incentivizes lower and middle income families adopting children, removing those children from state care and taking them off government support.
On top of that, the children who remain in foster care and orphanages long term tend to then be at greater risk for crime, substance abuse, and government benefits due to unemployment or low wages.  Placing these children in adoptive families long term lowers their costs to society and, in most cases, makes them actually be responsible long term tax payers.
In other words, the adoption tax credit actually leads to the creation of net new taxpayers.  Dynamically, the GOP should be giving the adoption tax credit and even adding to it.
Don't let the GOP get away with this.  Tell them to restore the adoption tax credit.


rn about the adoption tax credit and how you can take action by a sple text on your mobile device.



Thanks very much for taking action to save the adoption tax credit.  There are thousands of families that depend on it and your voice is making a real difference.
God bless,
Erick Erickson



Copyright © 2017 The Resurgent Media Group, LLC, All rights reserved.
This is the daily email from The Resurgent that you have previously signed up for.
Our mailing address is:

The Resurgent Media Group, LLC
PO Box 28978

, GA 31221
Add us to your address book



U.S. Senate contacts



Email Address




web site


(area code 202)





















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































September 07, 2017

NY State Appeals Court rules against assisted suicide - unanimously

This is good news , but it doesn't mean assisted suicide cannot be passed legislatively. It simply means there is no right to suicide in the NY State Constitution.

From the decision as covered in the Journal News -

The court ruled 5-0 against the plaintiffs, two of which have died since the lawsuit was first filed two years ago.

"Although New York has long recognized a competent adult's right to forgo life-saving medical care, we reject plaintiffs' argument that an individual has a fundamental constitutional right to aid-in-dying as they define it," the court's opinion read.

Thanks to Ed Mechmann, Director of Public Policy for the Archdiocese of NY, for sending this around -

Incredible good news!! The New York State Court of Appeals has unanimously refused to legalize assisted suicide. Here's the decision: https://www.nycourts.gov/ctapps/Decisions/2017/Sep17/77opn17-Decision.pdf 

 This is a gigantic win for the cause of human life. God is great!

Call your Senators today.

Tell Congress to defund Planned Parenthood.

Kristen  Gillebrand         http://gillibrand.senate.gov/,              Tel. (716) 854-9725

Chuck Schumer     Buffalo Phone: (716) 846-4111    Washington, D.C. Phone: (202) 224-6542


Dr. Anthony Pivarunas, a faithful Catholic OB/GYN in Buffalo, who practices medicine in accordance with the teachings of Christ, suffered a serious heart attack yesterday and is in urgent need of our prayers!  He is currently on life support. 

Please take a few moments today and offer your prayers for this true Friend for Life, who is struggling for his own life this day.

If God said, "Thou Shalt NOT Kill", perhaps, you might want to ask your pastor why he thinks God might be wrong about killing pre-born babies?

Liberal denominations beg Congress
to protect
Planned Parenthood

abortion , affordable care act , defund planned parenthood , obamacare , planned parenthood , presbyterian church usa , united church of christ , united methodist church

WASHINGTON, D.C., June 19, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) -- Protestants take diametrically opposing views of abortion in America. While the Southern Baptist Convention just "declared war" on Planned Parenthood, calling on Congress to defund the nation's largest abortion business of tax dollars, other denominations are urging Capitol Hill legislators to continue giving half a billion tax dollars to the country’s largest abortion provider.

More than 150 liberal organizations, including the United Methodist Church, the United Church of Christ, and the African Methodist Episcopal Church as well as Presbyterian and Jewish organizations, signed a letter calling for U.S. senators to keep Planned Parenthood on the government dole. The letter also champions support for Obamacare and Medicaid expansion.

“We urge you to oppose any repeal of the Affordable Care Act, attempts to change Medicaid’s open-ended funding guarantee into a block grant or per capita caps, and any attempts to defund Planned Parenthood,” the letter reads.

The General Board of Church and Society of the United Methodist Church, United Church of Christ's Justice and Witness Ministries, the Women's Missionary Society of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, and the National Council of Churches laid their weight squarely on tax funding for Planned Parenthood.

Other signing organizations under a religious banner include "Presbyterians Affirming Reproductive Options," the "NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice," the "National Council of Jewish Women" and several other groups professing Judaic foundations.

Besides other liberal, pro-abortion, and pro-homosexual organizations, the letter was signed by the League of Women Voters, the YWCA, and the Autistic Self Advocacy Network. All signing organizations are listed here.

"It’s scandalous that the United Methodist General Board of Church and Society is lobbying in favor of Planned Parenthood federal funding," Institute on Religion and Democracy President Mark Tooley, a Methodist, told LifeSiteNews.  

Tooley says his denomination is slowly transitioning from promoting a culture of death to affirming life. "United Methodism is heading in an increasingly pro-life direction and last year required the board to quit the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice. The board in its abortion rights advocacy represents a minority of USA United Methodists in an increasingly global and orthodox denomination that is returning to classic Christian teaching about the sanctity of all human life."

"Though only constituted as a denomination in 1957, the United Church of Christ (UCC) has been consistently in favor of abortion since the early 1970s," John Brown Jr. wrote in an expose on his denomination's historic support for abortion. "Even before that, a number of UCC clergy participated in ... as a nationwide illegal abortion referral system."

"The ongoing effort to bring change on the life issues within the UCC is somewhat akin to that of the pro-life movement to bring about change within our nation," Brown surmised. "Though there have been some victories, the UCC and the United States as a whole continue to promote a 'culture of death.'"

John S.A. Lomperis of the Institute on Religion and Democracy, himself a Methodist, told LifeSiteNews that the denomination's General Board of Church and Society (GBCS) is only one of several "subgroups" within the denomination that "sometimes contradict and fight with each other."

"In the United Methodist Church’s structure, there is only one body that can officially speak, represent, or DO anything on behalf of the entire United Methodist Church," Lomperis explained. "It’s called the General Conference. Its members are called delegates and are elected every four years, and I am one such delegate."

Lomperis went even further to illlumine the pro-abortion role of the GBCS. "This GBCS has long existed as a 'rogue agency' that only represents the most radical left wing minority of the church," he said. "We have been trying to bring accountability, but it has been a long struggle."

The U.S. House passed a bill to replace ObamaCare and defund Planned Parenthood, but the Senate has yet to act.  

It is important to note that the legislative effort to “defund” Planned Parenthood is misnamed. Planned Parenthood businesses charge for their services and will continue to.  The “defund” move simply redistributes tax dollars to non-aborting health clinics.

The House bill ensures health care access by redirecting tax funds to legitimate health clinics, which outnumber Planned Parenthood abortuaries across the nation 20-to-1.  Such legitimate health clinics offer much more comprehensive care and do not commit abortions.

Despite facts to the contrary, signers claimed that taking tax funding from the abortion behemoth would take away healthcare for the poor, including cancer screenings. 

Though its president and its promotional material proclaim the business does more legitimate healthcare for women than it does abortions, Planned Parenthood does not do mammograms, x-rays for cancer, biopsies, CT scans, endometrial biopsies, or many other basic cancer screenings.

Abortions outnumber even the simple, do-it-yourself breast exams at the nation's most lucrative abortion dealer.  

David Daleiden single-handedly changed the conversation on abortion in America when he exposed Planned Parenthood’s illegal sale of aborted baby body parts.
Now, Planned Parenthood’s allies in the California “justice” department are trying to send him to jail!
Life Legal Defense Foundation is committed to funding David’s legal expenses, but we are relying on the generous support of grassroots pro-life allies just like you to do it!

Will you please make a much-needed contribution today to help us fight for justice and continue the effort to expose, defund, and shut down the nation’s largest abortion provider once and for all?
Planned Parenthood is a massive organization with allies in all levels of government. They are bound and determined to throw this fearless investigator in prison, and it will certainly not be easy to defeat them.

But we have no other choice.
Your gift today will ensure that David Daleiden stays out of prison. It will ensure that pro-abortion politicians can’t imprison whistleblowers with impunity. It will preserve the safety of courageous investigators who fight for truth and life.
And most of all, it will bring us one step closer to defunding Planned Parenthood once and for all!

Please support Life Legal Defense Foundation today, and help us continue funding David Daleiden’s legal defense and all of the vitally important pro-life cases before us.
Thank you so much for your generous support!

Click here for Life Legal Defense Foundation


Copy and enter this address into your browser...


Here Are The Red State Dems Voting Against Gorsuch | TrumpTrain


Call their office, and vote them out!...

11 Democrat Senators represent states where Donald Trump won against Hillary Clinton. Only three of them, Joe Manchin from West Virginia, Heidi Heitkamp from North Dakota, and Joe Donnelly from Indiana, have promised to vote for the Constitution-loving Judge Gorsuch.

  • Bob Casey (Pennsylvania) - 2018

  • Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) - 2018

  • Bill Nelson (Florida) - 2018

  • Debbie Stabenow (Michigan) - 2018

  • Gary Peters (Michigan) - 2020

  • Claire McCaskill (Missouri) - 2018

  • Sherrod Brown (Ohio) - 2018

  • Joe Tester (Montana) - 2018

If you live in any of these states, call your senator immediately and let them know that you'll vote against them in 2018 and help sweep the Senate for Republicans to Make America Great Again.
Read more at http://trumptrainnews.com/articles/here-are-the-red-state-dems-voting-against-gorsuch#0E6OpcdL3QOSMyhP.99

Fargo, ND - When an ambulance was summoned on Wednesday to the Red River Women's Clinic abortion facility in Fargo, North Dakota, paramedics discovered that the gurney they used could not fit in the front door.

Instead, they went around to the back door and brought the patient out into an alley filled with trash dumpsters.

"It's almost like the Red River Women's Clinic sent this woman out with the trash," said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue. "Their only employee seen at the scene wore a pink eared-hat that vulgarly objectifies women and reduces them to merely their reproductive parts. It is a disgusting view of women that should make the Red River Women's Center staff blush with embarrassment."


Continue reading!

Visit this website to learn all about assisted suicide...

Click here!



4 things pro-life people should STOP doing right now


Congratulating Ourselves

We’re proabaly not winning. 44+ years of brutal, unrelenting slaughter is nothing to celebrate.

Setting the Bar Too Low

Instead of making abortion’s abolition a top priority we settle for praying & leave the rest to those with a “special calling”.  We have a President keeping his promises: we can’t sit by while the other side runs him down!

Focusing on the Wrong Stuff

Saving individual babies does not abolish abortion and political efforts are often thwarted because the public remains indifferent.

Obsessing Over Our Image

We’re afraid to display abortion victim images, afraid of being associated with anything or anyone “too radical”.  We need to be afraid of how God sees us!


4 things pro-life people should START doing right now



Weep for the children killed, for unrepentant killers, for our guilty nation & your own past apathy (if applicable, ask God to forgive you). Mourn publicly, deeply and repeatedly until the battle is won.  Our mascot should not be a smiley face.  Show the world that things are not all right.

Adopt a Wartime Mindset

Stop putting career advancement, social acceptance, domestic tranquility, pleasure and personal security above the life of those babies in the womb at risk of sudden death.

Protest Regularly

More than 40 million Americans agree that “abortion is always wrong”   If all of us were in the streets every week, demanded an end to abortion it would end almost immediately.  There is no substitute for street activism.  Get out in public and be a voice for the voiceless.

Challenge Others to Repent

Most pro-life Americans have never taken part in anti-abortion activity.  Some are scared, others selfish or distracted, while many simply have never considered it.  Call them to repent and become the heroes the children in the womb need!

Buffalo get going: 60 million casualties in the U.S. is an atrocity-SILENCE is no EXCUSE!

Friends & Countrymen: Bills promoting Suicide and Mercy Killing for the Old and the Sick in NYS Legislature:
Read Composition of the Health Committee ALSO new black Democrat added to committee to replace an anti-suicide vote from Buffalo. Far below see NYCF article on the committee. We have to hold what we had and build on it. Your friend Thomas Abinati (D, Greenburgh) is now a SPONSOR, as is our Sandy Galef (D, Ossining), and Amy Paulin (D, Scarsdale. we  have to hold onto Shelley Meyer (D, Yonkers) and Kevin Byrne (R, Mahopac). Dawn you have work to do on your Long Islanders, and Stacy you have two or three Assembly members involved. ---Ed Riely

The Governor is deeply confused about the abortion issue. He is confused in believing that the lives of unborn children are insignificant and disposable. He is confused in perceiving support for abortion as a pro-woman stance; in reality, many post-abortive women regret their abortions, many women are pressured or coerced into abortion, and at least half of aborted babies are female. Finally, the Governor is confused in his apparent belief that full-throated support for abortion on demand is his ticket to winning female voters--both here in New York and across the nation.

On January 30, the Governor declared, "Make no mistake, we will always protect the right to choose in New York." Governor, make no mistake: New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms and our allies will always protect the right to life in New York.



To reverse the abortion pill, act immediately:  Call (877) 558 0333 for help.  Go to  http://www.abortionpillreversal.com 

It may not be too late.

On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 9:25 PM, "slbukowski@netscape.net" <slbukowski@netscape.net> wrote:

Dear Friend of Life,

The NY State Assembly again this year passed the abortion expansion bill. It is expected to be defeated in the state Senate.

Please note, there were many WNY Assembly members who voted against abortion expansion. They were:

Dave DiPietro, R - East Aurora
Mickey Kearns, D- Buffalo
Angelo Morinello, R - Niagara Falls
Michael Norris, R - Lockport

Robin Schimminger, D - Kenmore
Ray Walter, R- Amherst

If your representative is on the list above, please consider sending a thank you note or email, especially to the Democrats who defied their party leadership to defend the child in the womb.

Addresses and emails are at http://nyassembly.gov/mem/

Scroll down to find the one you want.

If you wish to check the vote by roll call, go to: 


Thank you,

Dr. Stan Bukowski

Dear Stasia,

 During his campaign for president, and on his transition website, President-elect Donald Trump offered to “protect innocent human life from conception to natural death,” and “protect individual conscience in healthcare.”


 Let’s make sure he does it, and the right way.

 The Trump administration needs to cancel two regulations in particular.

 The first is the infamous Mandate requiring even religiously affiliated institutions to have contraception and some early abortifacients offered free in their health care plans. The feds have not yet stopped chasing and threatening the Little Sisters to force their will on them.

 The second is a regulation you may not have heard a lot about yet. It was issued in connection with section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) by the Department of Health and Human Services.  Section 1557 forbids “sex discrimination” in any health program or activity.  Obviously, “sex” means discrimination because a person is male or female, and Congress has always been clear about that.  The Obama administration’s new rule however, defines “sex” to include – among other things - discrimination based on “termination of pregnancy.” Of course, abortion-friendly judges and regulators will be only too happy to read this to require the provision of, or coverage or referral for, abortion.

 The rule has no conscience protection attached. Some people believe that an earlier enacted conscience rule might help (the Weldon Amendment), but the Obama administration has interpreted that rule narrowly so that it would not likely protect us.

 The idea that abortion is so essential to women’s freedom that it is “sex discrimination” to fail to embrace abortion is just sick. Any feminism possessed of a heart + rational mind must recoil.

 So how do we get the Trump administration to get rid of these awful legacies of the Obama administration?  Well, if Congress actually overturns the Affordable Care Act, the regulations attached to it would be out the window. Congress and the President-elect are seriously suggesting that option–but it could take them a while, even years.

 In the meantime, how can we protect institutions that object to contraception and abortion coverage? Two ways are possible:

 1. A Trump administration Health and Human Services Agency might write new regs protecting conscience rights. But remember this requires first, “proposed rules,” then notice and comment periods, then final rules.  Time consuming, but it’s a possible avenue.

 2. A Trump administration could also provide guidance to agencies not to prioritize enforcement of bad rules, while working to replace them with good ones. Also possible.

 We need to start making some noise about undoing these regs. Everyone should say something, but medical personnel – nurses, doctors, physicians’ assistants, etc. – are especially welcome!

 Are you in?

 Call Rep. Tom Price, soon-to-be Secretary of Health and Human Services, at 202-225-4501 tomorrow during regular business hours.

 You can say something like:

 "Religious health care providers and employers are still suffering under the HHS Contraception Mandate and the Abortion Mandate under section 1557 of Obamacare.  Can Congressman Price let me know how quickly he and the Trump administration can provide relief for the Little Sisters of the Poor and other groups? Thank you!"

 You can also send him a fax here: 202-225-4656

 Or you can mail him a letter at his Washington DC Office. Letters can often be delayed through the screening process, so it’s important to write ASAP:

Congressman Tom Price
100 Cannon House Office Building
Washington DC 20515

 Please let WSFT know when you have reached out.

 Keep speaking for yourself!

 With gratitude for your efforts,


Chojnowski: The Kissinger Report: The Depopulation Agenda of America’s Elite 1974 to 1993

06/10/16 16:10 

The 1974 memorandum of CFR's Henry Kissinger was to clearly identify the
interests of the United States, as a government and a nation, with controlling
and reducing the populations of Developing Nations by means of contraception and abortion.

Read the report here.

The Kissinger Report: The Depopulation
Agenda of America’s Elite 1974 to 1993

By Peter Chojnowski, Ph.D

On December 10, 1974, Henry Kissinger (born Heinz Alfred Kissinger in Bavaria, Germany in 1923), National Security Advisor and Secretary of State to President Gerald Ford, issued National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200), which was gradually declassified and finally released to the public in 1989. 

The secrecy of the document at the time required that the document’s declassification and release could only be sanctioned by the White House itself. Following upon the Supreme Court ruling of January 22, 1973, Roe v. Wadestriking down every state law restricting procured abortions within the United States, this National Security Directive explicitly identified the long term prosperity of the United States, along with the long term interests of the United States government, with a policy of radical reductions of populations and population growth with a multiplicity of nations in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. 

The intent of this memorandum was to clearly identify the interests of the United States, as a government and as a nation, with controlling and reducing the populations of the Developing Nations by means of contraception and abortion. 

Kissinger’s Projected Demographic Apocalypse

In the Executive Summary of NSSM 200 for President Ford, world population growth after 1950 is portrayed as “quantitatively and qualitatively different from any previous epoch in human history.”1 The statistics given to justify this assertion were that, “The rapid reduction in death rates, unmatched by corresponding birth rate reductions, has brought total growth rates close to 2% a year, compared with about 1% before World War II, under 0.5% in 1750-1900 and even far lower rates before 1750. The effect is to double the world’s population in 35 years instead of 100 years. Almost 80 million people are being added each year, compared with 10 million in 1900.”2Within 3 pages of the title of this Memorandum, Kissinger makes clear that it is “a two child family,” both within and without America, that will be the goal of United States government policy. Even if, he states, “a two-child family should become the norm in the future,” “policies to reduce fertility will have their main effects on total numbers only after several decades.”3 The ultimate intent for United States “interests” is, also, made clear on the same page of the Memorandum, when it is emphasized that for the reduced native populations of the targeted countries there will be, “lowered demands on food, health, and educational and other services,” hence resources –no longer wasted on feeding, educating, and healing their own people –can be allocated to enlarging “capacity to contribute to productive investments [presumably foreign investments], thus accelerating development.”4

The apocalyptic tone of NSSM 200, which was used to justify the massive allocation of resources and monies designated for the population control program speaks of the world situation in “the short and middle term” as involving “the possibility of massive famines in certain parts of the world, especially the poorest [read “overpopulated”] regions.”5 

The “population explosion” also threatens longer-term food production through “cultivation of marginal lands, overgrazing, desertification, deforestation, and soil erosion, with consequent destruction of land and pollution of water, rapid siltation of reservoirs, and impairment of inland and coastal fisheries.”6 Even though speaking about “massive famines” for the countries of the Third World, Kissinger does all he can to indicate that attempts to increase the food supply in these countries will not ameliorate the problems on account of the negative consequences of more intensive agricultural development. 

The Kissinger Reports discourages any solution to the “problem” of “overpopulation” that involved increased food production by stating, “Capital and foreign exchange requirements for intensive agriculture are heavy, and are aggravated by energy cost increases and fertilizer scarcities and price rises. The institutional, technical, and economic problems of transforming traditional agriculture are also very difficult to overcome.”7

Infertility and Sterility as the Only Acceptable Program: Confidential

Under a page heading marked “Confidential,” The Kissinger Report, which has identified that the major problem for the United States government and the world at large is that there were too many people being born into the world, then sets out to identify the causes of the “high birth rates” in many parts of the world. Of course, in light of the secularist utilitarian oligarchic attitude of the writer of the memorandum, the main “problem” to be overcome in the fight against too many of a certain type of people in the world is ignorance. In fact, the first cause of escalating populations is identified as “inadequate information about and availability of means of fertility control.”8 

Added to this, the motivation to have as many children as possible is engendered by high child and infant mortality rates, along with the belief that it will be one’s own children who will take care of their parents during the parents’ old age.9 

Sprinkled with “humanitarian” pledges to “improve health care and nutrition [for those who are allowed to be born],” “education and improved social status for women,” and “improved old age security” [as if a check in the mail will replace being surrounded by a large and loving family in one’s old age], the critical solution to the “problem” of fertility requires efforts to increase “demand” by birth control information and efforts to render large families less desirable, along with the necessity to then provide for this increase demand by an adequate “supply,” that is to “assure full availability by 1980 of birth control [means] to all fertile individuals.”10 The countries most specifically designated as needing population control “aid,” were: Mexico, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia, and Columbia. 

For these nations, The Kissinger Report draws the following conclusion, “While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two child family on average), by about the year 2000…. this goal would result in 500 million fewer people in 2000 and about 3 billion fewer in 2050.” The crassly materialistic and self-aggrandizing aspect of this Memorandum is shown when Kissinger explains how rapid population growth in Third World nations, especially in African nations, will interfere with Western procurement of mineral resources. 

According to the executive summary, “Rapid population growth is not in itself a major factor in pressure on depletable resources (fossil fuels and other minerals), since demand for them depends more on levels of industrial output than on numbers of people. On the other hand, the world is increasingly dependent on mineral supplies from developing countries, and if rapid population frustrates their prospects of economic development and social progress, the resulting instability may undermine the conditions for expanded output and sustained flows of such resources.11 Kissinger concludes his executive summary to fellow Republican, President Gerald Ford, by stating, “Attainment of this goal will require greatly intensified population programs.”12 

NSSM 200 became official governmental policy on November 26, 1975 when National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft signed, in the name of President Gerald Ford, National Security Decision Memorandum 314, which states, “The President has reviewed the interagency response to NSSM 200 and the covering memorandum from the Chairman of the NSC Under Secretaries Committee. He believes that United States leadership is essential to combat population growth, to implement the World Population Plan of Action and to advance United States security and overseas interests. The President endorses the policy recommendations contained in the Executive Summary of the NSSM 200.”13

Kissinger Report as Rockefeller CFR Agenda: The Eugenics Masters

If we look objectively at the Nixon and Ford administrations during which the United States both legalized abortion and committed itself to a world-wide contraceptive and abortion program, we cannot help but see then as a Nelson Rockefeller Administration, without Nelson Rockefeller. This “without Nelson Rockefeller” is, of course, qualified by the fact that Rockefeller emerged as Vice President of the United States as a result of the resignation of Richard Nixon and the activation of the 25th Amendment. The major figures of the Nixon administration from 1969 to 1974, were those who were in some way protégés or professional assistants of Nelson Rockefeller and his family. Richard Nixon, “opponent” of Nelson Rockefeller in 2 of his 3 runs for the presidency during the 1960s, had been Rockefeller’s tenant and neighbor when the two both resided at 810 Fifth Avenue from the years 1966-1968 when Nixon worked in the firm of John Mitchell, Rockefeller’s personal attorney.14 This was the same building in which occurred the famous, “Munich of the Republican Party” –so called by Senator Barry Goldwater –in which Richard Nixon, during the summer of 1960 met with Nelson Rockefeller to refashion the conservative Republican electoral platform of the Taft faction,15 instead, producing a document that Edith Kermit Roosevelt called, “a carbon copy of the Democratic platform drawn up by Chester Bowles, Council of Foreign Relation member and former trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation.”16 It was, perhaps, at this same meeting that Nelson Rockefeller was offered the vice presidential nomination by the Republican presidential nominee.17

It should not then be surprising that when Nixon made his chief choices for his administration, Spiro Agnew as his Vice President and Henry Kissinger as his National Security Advisor and, later, Secretary of State, the former should have been Nelson Rockefeller’s presidential campaign chairman during his 1968 run for the presidency and the later should be Rockefeller’s foreign affairs advisor when Nelson was governor of New York. Kissinger’s relationship to Rockefeller was the main reason why Kissinger became one of the leading minds on the Council on Foreign Relations. According to J. Robert Moskin, “It was principally because of his long association with the Rockefellers that Henry Kissinger became a force in the Council. The New York Times called him ‘The Council’s most influential member,’ and a Council insider says that ‘his influence is indirect and enormous –much of it through his Rockefeller connection.”18 The role of Nelson Rockefeller in the life of Henry Kissinger, author of America’s Birth Control and Abortion Agenda, was confirmed by none other than Kissinger himself, when he dedicated his book, White House Years, not to Richard Nixon who had appointed him to his only official governmental positions, but rather, to Nelson Rockefeller “the single most influential person in my life.”19

The Rockefellers were the richest and most prominent supporters of what can only be called a “eugenics” movement (from the Greek words meaning “happy birth”), which has its origin in the theories of Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) who was the first to put forward the notion that the size of the population must press against the limits of the food supply because of the “breeding habits” of the “lower classes of society.” Mirroring the views of our contemporary libertarian activists, Malthus – although rejecting government financed birth prevention – believed that by denying the poor all charity, public or private, they would experience fully both the costs and benefits of their reproductive decisions and conform their marriages and childbearing with their earning abilities.20 

Even though Charles Darwin admitted to being inspired by Malthus’ studies, it was Herbert Spencer (1820-1903) who would inspire the great business magnates of the time, most particularly John D. Rockefeller, Sr. It was Spencer who coined the phrase, “survival of the fittest,” to describe the process of competition by which optimal development occurs in social systems. The benefits derived from the competitive process, i.e., weeding out the unfit, led him to oppose any government interference that might frustrate the process.21 

From the historic evidence it is clear that it was the Anglo-American elite who first trumpeted the need for national eugenic policies. In 1912, the First International Congress of Eugenics was held at the University of London. The vice presidents of this conference included Winston Churchill, Charles Eliot (President of Harvard University), David Starr Jordan (President of Stamford University), and other notables. Its goal: “the prevention of the propagation of the unfit.”22 The Third Congress, meeting in 1932, featured a call for the sterilization of 14 million Americans with low intelligence-test scores.23

The United States quickly became the focal point and base for the Population Control Movement, achieving embodiment in Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood) and Hugh Moore (of the Dixie Cup fortune). In the pages of Sanger’s Birth Control Review, all the way back in 1919, was stated in a forthright way the purpose for the Birth Control Movement, “More children from the fit, less from the unfit – that is the chief issue of birth control.” Not really differing from the Social Darwinism of the German National Socialists, Sanger also stated that “funds that should be used to raise the standard of our civilization are diverted to maintenance of those who never should have been born.”24 

It was the “conversion” of Hugh Moore, however, to the eugenics camp that initiated the next stage of the birth control movement, the stage where the Rockefellers, John D. Jr., John D. III, Nelson, and David take up –- and pay for –- the banner. In this regard, Hugh Moore was persuaded by a 1948 book written by William Vogt, a former official of Planned Parenthood, that there was a “population bomb” that would “explode” and destroy our civilization. From then on Moore devoted much of his fortune and energies to publicizing “the bomb” and enlisting support for population control measures. It was Moore that allowed Paul Ehrlich to use the title of one of his pamphlets in Ehrlich’s 1968 book The Population Bomb.25 

We have spoken of the connection between Richard Nixon and Governor Nelson Rockefeller, the New York governor who signed his state’s abortion legalization bill in 1970. In the same year as the New York legalization, Nixon appointed Nelson’s brother John D. Rockefeller, III, founder of the Population Council, to a Commission on Population Growth and the American Future. John D. Rockefeller, III, long a supporter of the eugenics movement, reported to Congress that since further population growth would not advance such essential national interests as “the vitality of business,” it had better stop.26 

Global 2000: Making Religion a Tool of Depopulation Policies

That Henry Kissinger was implementing, with NSSM 200, an established Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) agenda can be clearly seen when, in 1975, concurrent with Kissinger’s progressive implementation of NSSM 200, the CFR’s 1980s Project, produced a volume entitled, Six Billion People: Demographic Dilemmas and World Politics, which echoed The Kissinger Report by calling for the deurbanization of the Third World to curb population growth. It concludes that, in a world of rapidly increasing population, it was not possible to curb population without restricting some elements of freedom.27 

In 1976, Kissinger indicated that “restricting some elements of freedom” was not the only grim aspect of the utopian idea of a “healthy” depopulated globe. In a follow-up document to NSSM 200 entitled, “First Annual Report on US International Population Policy (at least the document acknowledges forthrightly that this was indeed US government policy), the document outlines a psychological warfare strategy for overcoming opposition to the population control agenda. 

In this report the various religions, political, and cultural “impediments” are mentioned and methods which are “fine-tuned to the particular sensitivities of each of these countries” are advanced.28 One of the first telling recommendations coming from this report was the advice to avoid the very term “birth control.” In this regard we read, “In the case of countries uncommitted to population programs, our efforts must be fine-tuned to their particular sensitivities and attitudes. In the main, we should avoid the language of "birth control" in favor of "family planning" or "responsible parenthood," with the emphasis being placed on child spacing in the interests of the health of child and mother and the well-being of the family and community.”29 

Among reasons why there are nations which are refusing the birth control agenda adopted by the U.S. government, the Report identifies “religious influences” and “traditionalism.”30 Another reason given is that “birth control” aid is identified with the United States [seemingly, for good reason], which may produce negative resentment. Moreover, the United States must adopt what can only be called a “feminist” agenda, on account of the fact that, “in many of the uncommitted countries, male machismo, inhibitions about discussing sex issues, and the subservient role of women combine as major obstacles to family planning.”31

Clearly, part of the psychological preparation of the uncooperative segments of the world’s population, was to enlist the assistance of religion in the drive for population control and decreases in the fertility rate. It also began in 1975 with Secretary of State Henry Kissinger establishing a policy-planning group in the US Department of State’s Office of Population Affairs. The group’s main task was to prepare the National Security Council’s “Global 2000 Report to the President.”32 This Report, written finally by the director of the policy group Dr. Gerald Barney, was submitted to then President Jimmy Carter and also made public and sold to over 1.5 million people in 8 languages. Dr. Barney has spoken of the Report as the only public report by any national government on the economic, demographic, resource, and environmental future of the world.33 

What interests us, however, is the “updating” done in 1993 by the Millennium Institute led by the same Dr. Barney. This updated analysis of the same global future heading into the year 2000 was entitled, Global 2000 Revisited. The reason Dr. Barney gives for this new update is that, “Global 2000 is now 13 years old, and although most if its trends are still basically disconcertingly accurate, it needs updating. This report assembles new data on most of the basic trends reported in the original Global 2000.”34 The author hoped that the newly inaugurated President Bill Clinton would do a full update. 

Global 2000
 was being written right before a meeting of the Parliament of the World’s Religions and, therefore, the authors took time to emphasize that they believe that “spiritual leaders have a vital contribution to make to a country’s reflections on sustainable possibilities for the future.”35 In these “reflections” urged by the authors, the “spiritual leaders” should train themselves to consider the dawning of the 21st century as an “anniversary of Earth” [rather, we surmise, than as the bi-millennial anniversary of the Incarnation]. This anniversary must be one in which “all nations, cultures, and faith traditions participate.” The 21st century must be the time to encourage a major shift in human attitudes and institutional goals, a shift towards a “sustainable future.” In order to achieve this, we all need to achieve a new mentality in which we humans “give up old, 20th century ways of thinking and living.”36 

At this point in Global 2000 Revisited, we have a repetition of the official Neo-Malthusian overpopulation mantra, “For more than a billion of Earth’s desperately poor humans, the outlook for food and other necessities of life will be no better. Life for billions will be more precarious in the 21st century than it is now – unless the faith traditions of the world lead the nations and peoples of Earth to act decisively to alter current beliefs and policies.”37 

Apparently the efforts to psychologically manipulate the uncooperative nations of the world had not been working over the past 20 years, since, “Currently [1993] the world’s population is growing faster than ever before.” However, if “drastic declines in human fertility (or very large increases in mortality) occur over the next five years, it would be possible to stabilize the human population at about 12 billion within a century.” In order for “such a rapid drop in human fertility to occur, it will be necessary to change the religious, social, economic, and legal factors that shape couple’s decisions on the number of children they have….but most importantly, religious teachings…must shift to encourage small families.”38 If overpopulation does not recede, the carbon dioxide concentrations will cause “planet-wide changes in temperatures and weather patterns. Such changes would seriously disrupt agriculture throughout the world as early as the first half of the 21st century.39 

So what did Global 2000 Revisited say to the religious leaders in 1993, after some 90 years of population control propaganda and militancy? Rather than, rather awkwardly, give them specific instructions, it instead asks a series of leading questions. “What does your faith tradition teach about the human destiny? Is the human destiny separable from that of Earth? What does your tradition teach concerning the destiny of followers of other traditions? How does your faith tradition characterize the teachings and followers of other faiths? Do some adherent of your tradition hold that the teachings and followers of other faiths are evil, dangerous, or even misguided? Is there any possibility that your faith tradition can derive wisdom, truth, or insight from the teachings of another faith? What are the traditional teachings – and the range of other opinions – within your faith on the possibility of criticism, correction, reinterpretation, and even rejection of ancient traditional assumptions and ‘truth’ in light of new understandings or revelations? Does your faith tradition envision new revelation, new understanding, new interpretation, new wisdom, and new faith concerning human activity affecting the future of the Earth?”40 

These questions indicate that orthodox Christianity cannot be allowed to survive if the globe is to be saved from demographic and environmental disaster –finally we get to the core of the Birth Control Agenda. But, have we not just heard a perfect articulation of the New Religion of our time? In this attempt to hijack the ancient Christian Faith, they, definitely, think they have won.

The 1993 Global 2000 Revisited population control document
called for avoiding the language of "birth control" in favor of
"family planning" or "responsible parenthood," two slogans
adopted by post-Conciliar churchmen.

1 National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (The Kissinger Report), December 10, 1974, classified by Harry C. Barney III and fully declassified and released July 3, 1989 by F. Graboske, National Security Council, pp. 1-3. 
2 Ibid., p. 3, Executive Summary.
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid., p. 4.
6 Ibid., p. 5.
7 Ibid.
8 Ibid., p. 6.
9 Ibid., pp. 6-7.
10 Ibid., p. 7.
11 Ibid., p. 5. 
12 Ibid., p. 10. 
13 Brent Scowcroft, National Security Decision Memorandum 314, November 26, 1975, issued and declassified by National Security Council, Washington, DC.
14 James Perloff, The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline (Appleton, WI: Western Islands Publishers, 1988), p. 144. 
15 Theodore White, The Making of the President, 1960 (New York: Atheneum, 1961), p. 199. 
16 Edith Kermit Roosevelt, “Elite Clique Holds Power in U.S.,” Indianapolis News (December 23, 1961), p. 6. 
17 Richard Norton Smith, On His Own Terms: A Life of Nelson Rockefeller (New York: Random House, 2014), chapter 18.
18 J. Robert Moskin, “Advise and Dissent,” Town and Country, March 1987, p. 156.
19 Henry Kissinger, White House Years (Boston: Little, Brown, 1979), p. 4.
20 Jacqueline Kasun, The War Against Population: The Economics and Ideology of World Population Control (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1999), pp. 212-213. 
21 Ibid., p. 213. Cf. Allen Chase, The Legacy of Malthus: The Social Costs of the New Scientific Racism (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1977), p. 8.
22 Chase, p. 19.
23 Ibid., p. 20.
24 Kasun, p. 216.
25 Ibid. p. 217.
26 Ibid., p. 219.
27 Servando Gonzalez, I Dare Call It Treason: The Council on Foreign Relations and the Betrayal of the American People (Hayward, CA: Spooks Books, 2013), p. 147.
28 Ibid.
29 National Security Council Population Task Force, First Progress Report, 1976. Dated January 3, 1977. Issued by Brent Scowcroft for President Gerald Ford, p. 7.
30 Ibid., pp. 28-29.
31 Ibid., pp. 29-31.
32 Gonzalez, p. 147.
33 Dr. Gerald Barney, Jane Blewett, and Kristen Barney, Global 2000 Revisited from Millennium Institute website.
34 Ibid., p. 1.
35 Ibid.
36 Ibid.
37 Ibid., p. 3.
38 Ibid., p. 3.
39 Ibid., p. 4.
40 Ibid., p. 5.

Originally published in the February 2016 edition of Catholic Family News

Will you help the Philippines?

Dear Stasia,

 I wrote you a few days ago about what’s going on in the Philippines.

I’m writing again because I really need to hear from you.  It is vital that you respond to this email .

Catholics in the Philippines are facing a very serious threat from their new President. He wants to launch an involuntary Three-Child Policy (population control) in the Philippines.

The Catholic Bishops of the Philippines have asked for help from Population Research Institute as soon as possible.  

Therefore, I ask for your help.

Help to do what?  To teach citizens how to protect themselves against involuntary population control by working in the democratic process.

In just six weeks, we will be doing that in the Philippines.  

Who’s “we”?  Your Population Research Institute will be working with Family Life International of Australia, a proven partner in that part of the world.

We will teach 2,500 pro-life leaders and citizens

  • How to work with the conventional media to educate their fellow citizens

  • How to use social media to mobilize world opinion

  • How to build coalitions

  • How to mobilize citizens for mass meetings

  • How to persuade an audience

  • How to design a legislative strategy

  • How to lobby

The Bishops asked us to provide this training.  They see it as the best way to protect their people from the population control plans of President Rodrigo Duterte.

Duterte was sworn in as President on June 10--and immediately began talking about a Three-Child Policy.  

Will it be modeled on the Two-Child Policy of China?  

Maybe Duterte is doing this because he is ideologically so close to China – that’s the Philippines’ biggest trading partner, after all.

You know what this kind of population control meant in China: pregnancy police, government-granted pregnancy licenses, forced abortions and forced sterilizations….  The most anti-human rights, anti-human life activity the world has ever seen.

We can’t let that happen to the Philippines, the most Catholic country in the world.  Over 80% of the people of the Philippines are Catholic!

This bad idea must be stopped in its tracks.

The birthrate is already going down in the Philippines.  The total fertility rate is already below replacement levels.  But that doesn’t stop President Duterte!

The road to a three-child policy has been slowly paved for decades.  

A 1967 Declaration on Population and established a Population Commission.  In 1970, Executive Order 233 empowered the Population Commission to start a national population program.

In 1971, The Population Act was passed, making family planning part of national development strategy.  Ever since then, a little bit at a time, more policies have been put into place that give the government power over the fertility of its citizens.  

Today the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act is on the books – and it’s the law that Duterte can use to start a pregnancy police in the Philippines.

Involuntary population control is a very real threat in the Philippines.

But only if the Catholic people of the Philippines don’t resist these policies effectively!

That’s where PRI comes in.

We have been asked to teach the Catholic people how to resist effectively.  

Forty years of leadership in the pro-life movement in the US and around the world have taught PRI how to work every angle, use every approach, fight every step of the way, find every new line of defense.

That’s how the pro-life movement has kept the fight going.

The Bishops of the Philippines have watched us work around the world.  They know PRI can bring the skills they need:  how to change public opinion, how to put laws under a microscope, how to build coalitions to stop bad legislation.

In other words, how to work peacefully within the existing legal and public policy system to defend the most basic of human rights, the right to live.

But we have to act right away.  

This fight will not wait until next year.  The battle is now!

Your response is needed right away.

Here is what the Bishops have asked us to do:

On  September 30, we will launch the biggest training blitz ever in the Philippines.  We will train 2,500 pro-life leaders from across the country.   Our team will barnstorm across many of the 7,000 islands that make up the archipelago nation and train even more activists.

President Duterte is ruthless.  When he sets a goal, nothing gets in his way. He has already told the world that he’s happy to have the same reputation as Idi Amin, the butcher of Uganda, in pursuit of his goals. (keep this hyperlink in the final?)

Duterte needs to know that his people -- and the world -- will not tolerate his making  a Three-Child Policy one of his goals.  

The Catholic people must make the political cost to him more than he is expecting.  

That’s why the Bishops of the Philippines asked PRI to do everything we can to train leaders to mobilize citizen sentiment against the anti-life, anti-family plans of Duterte.  As soon as possible.  

Because I know I can count on you to help (hyperlink), I told the Bishops that PRI can help.  

It will cost us $20,000 to do the whole job.  It wasn’t a planned expenditure—how could it be?  Who knew it was coming?

Nonetheless, I told my staff to start working on it immediately.  

I need $7,662.00 by Friday, July 29, to buy the airplane tickets for the training staff.  That is two days away.

I know I can count on you to help me resist population control tyranny anywhere in the world.  

The Bishops of the Philippines are counting on PRI – they are counting on you -- to help PRI to help the most Catholic nation on the planet to protect itself from vicious, ideologically-driven population control tyranny.

Only you help PRI.  We have no other source of support but you.

Can you send a gift of $50 or more  right away to help us to help the people of the Philippines to protect themselves against a Three-Child Policy?

If you can’t send $50, please send $40, or whatever amount you can spare.  

I am grateful for any gift you send.  The world is watching the work that your gifts make possible.

Thank you.  God bless your generosity!

Steve Mosher
Population Research Institute

Join us in boycotting the anti-disability film "Me Before You"

(Spoiler Alert)

The film Me Before You is set to be released this Friday, June 3rd. The film follows a romance between two of its characters, one of whom eventually ends his life at a suicide clinic because he does not want to live as a quadriplegic.

Liz Carr, a disability rights activist at Not Dead Yet UK, explains the terrible message of this story: “if you’re a disabled person, you’re better off dead”.

Whether or not the filmmakers intended this message, it is certainly there. This is where the “right to die” (i.e. the right to be killed) movement leads.

Sign here: http://www.citizengo.org/en/lf/34858-new-film-spreads-message-disabled-lives-are-not-worth-living-we-say-they-are

Films like this, which juxtapose the wonderful life the disabled person once lived, when he was not disabled, with the difficult life he now lives, create a negative portrayal of disability and contribute to the view that life under conditions of severe disability is not worth living. Me Before You, and the larger movement that inspired the movie, ignore the inherent dignity and beauty of human life, regardless of disability.

Campaigners who favor assisted suicide focus on ‘autonomy’ and ‘choice’, but choices always exist in a social context. The prejudiced view against the lives of disabled people in this film is also the view of too many people in society. The soft bigotry of low expectations and societal pressure influence the ‘choice’ to commit suicide.

There are sharp disagreements on this issue, and this issue personally affects many of us, but Not Dead Yet and other disability advocacy groups are right to recognise the danger inherent in this film and the message it sends.

Sign here: http://www.citizengo.org/en/lf/34858-new-film-spreads-message-disabled-lives-are-not-worth-living-we-say-they-are

All persons have inherent dignity and rights and it is a tragedy whenever an individual, disabled or not, fails to recognise that dignity.

The wish to commit suicide should not be met with encouragement or submission – it should be met with assistance to overcome the obstacles that the person faces. People who are contemplating suicide should be assisted to live, not to die.


Caroline Craddock and the entire CitizenGO team

P.S. Please sign this petition asking Warner Brothers, the producers of this film, to apologize for the offence they have caused to many disabled persons who recognise their own value and do not want to be killed.

Warner Brothers should publicly state that they do not endorse suicide.

Sign here: http://www.citizengo.org/en/lf/34858-new-film-spreads-message-disabled-lives-are-not-worth-living-we-say-they-are

P.P.S. Use the hashtag #BoycottMeBeforeYou when you share this petition!

Boycott anti-disability film "Me Before You"

I write to you today in regards to the film Me Before You, produced by Warner Brothers, which is set to be released this Friday.

In the film, the disabled character kills himself at a suicide clinic. Many people, disabled and not, are deeply concerned to see yet another film which casts non-disabled people as disabled people and shows the lives of disabled people as unworthy of living.

Please sign this petition to Warner Brothers, asking for an apology for the offence caused and for a public statement declaring that Warner Brothers does not support, or wish to promote, assisted suicide.




--refuse to let them dictate the terms of engagement….all our letters, calls, letters to editors and ‘legislators’ have to call it MEDICAL MURDER ACT!!!!

All U.S. public schools to go gender neutral...

WASHINGTON (UPI) The Obama administration planned on 5/13 to order public schools to allow transgender students to use the bathroom with which they are most comfortable.

The administration is instructing schools across the country to permit students to choose their bathroom without restriction in reaction to a law passed in North Carolina requiring all transgender people to use the bathroom of the gender they were born.

“As is consistently recognized in civil rights cases, the desire to accommodate others’ discomfort cannot justify a policy that singles out and disadvantages a particular class of students,” wrote Catherine Lhamon, the assistant secretary of education for civil rights, and Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, in a letter to be released on Friday, The Washington Post reported.

The letter threatens to withhold funding from schools that force transgender people to use a bathroom other than the gender they identify themselves as, citing Title IX regulations prohibiting sex discrimination in federally funded schools.

It should be pointed out that Obama's girls do not attend public schools, so this edict does not apply to his family. It only applies to the rest of us.

Target Stores are fully engaged into Obama's, (...and the Democratic Party's) so-called transgender bathroom policy.

If you think that men who are physically male should not share the bathroom with your young girls, perhaps a boycott is in order.

Think about it!

Take Action to Stop Assisted Suicide in NYS

Send Message Now

The State Legislature returns to Albany this week for two final months of the 2016 Session. An urgent priority is to defeat legislation that would legalize doctor-assisted suicide. Proponents of assisted suicide have targeted our state and hope to have lawmakers voting on this before the end of June. Please send a message to your elected representatives now to let them know that directly causing death is not an acceptable answer to terminal illness, aging, or disability.

here for an easily editable message you can send to your lawmakers with just a few clicks. And please share with your friends and family and urge them to take action as well.

Click the link below to log in and send your message:

Dear Friends,will our country look like in the year 2020? Our next president will have a tremendous influence on the future of faith, family, and freedom in America. With New York's Presidential Primary approaching, we wanted to make sure you knew that our FRC Action Presidential Voter Guide is out.

As New York voters decide who they will support, be equipped with the facts about the candidates' positions on many important issues.

We have looked at the records of each of the candidates:

  • Hillary Clinton Ted Cruz
  • John Kasich
  • Bernie Sanders
  • Donald Trump

See where they stand on issues like Planned Parenthood funding, the future of natural marriage, legislation that will protect people of faith from government discrimination, and others. As each of us makes our decision, it is essential to know which of these positions the candidates support, oppose, and which they have not been willing to publicly take a clear position on.


FRC Action

P.S. Please feel free share this email with friends and family and encourage them to vote their values.

FRC Action is a tax-exempt corporation under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. Financial contributions to FRC Action are not tax-deductible.

Democratic Candidates claim that unborn children
are not protected by the Constitution!!!

Hillary Clinton on Abortion: “The Unborn Person Doesn’t Have Constitutional Rights”
In a new interview today, pro-abortion presidential candidate Hillary Clinton couldn’t have made her radical abortion views more clear. Clinton said unborn children simply do not have any Constitutional rights, which would include the right to life. Click to Read at LifeNews.com.


Bernie Sanders Agrees With Hillary Clinton: No Constitutional Rights for Unborn Children
Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are two peas in a pod when it comes to abortion. They both believe unborn children should have no Constitutional rights, inducing the right to life. Click to Read at LifeNews.com.


Obama Apparently Agrees With Hillary Clinton: Unborn Children Have No Constitutional Rights
The top spokesman for President Barack Obama appears to agree with pro-abortion Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton that unborn children do not have Constitutional rights, including a right to life.    Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

This means that, for nine months, YOU were not protected by our constitution. You had zero rights.

How about that?

You were not legally a person, but if you wonder when you became a human being, check this out... When did my life begin?

PLEASE print & send the above postcards demanding we STOP funding PP to Obama, Biden, Schumer, Gillebrand, Collins, Higgins, Reed & Slaughter.

Need an address for your representatives and legislators?                Click here...

Our president sheds tears for the victims of gun violence!

More children are killed by abortion than have ever been killed by guns!

Where are the tears for these tiny victims of abortion?

There are no tears from the president!

There are no tears from the Democratic Party!

Not one tear for the millions of children slaughtered by abortion...

Christians are an Endangered Species

The Crackdown Has Begun.

Dear Stasia,

I told you barely nine weeks ago that I believed a crackdown was coming and your own religious freedom would be in jeopardy. I didn't really know it would hit this fast and hit this hard.

But here it is.

While the Supreme Court was pondering in Obergefell v. Hodges whether to invent—out of thin air—a constitutional "right" to same-sex marriage, we heard President Obama's own appointee, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, admit that religious groups could be at risk of being punished if they stood by the tenets of their faith and refused to go along with the redefinition of marriage.

How would they be punished? By losing their tax-exempt status, crippling their ability to raise funds and accomplish their mission.

And more. Barely a week after the Obergefell ruling, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries was emboldened enough to order a company called Sweet Cakes by Melissa to pay a lesbian couple $135,000 because Melissa declined to participate in their wedding by baking them a cake!

Some state government agencies and officials are already penalizing people for their moral and religious convictions about marriage!

What we are seeing are the side effects of a tragedy.

The New York Times columnist, Mark Oppenheimer, declared in Time magazine: "Rather than try to rescue tax-exempt status for organizations that dissent from settled public policy on matters of race or sexuality, we need to take a more radical step. It's time to abolish, or greatly diminish, their tax-exempt statuses."

Your freedoms are under fire in a way we have never before witnessed. We must fight back.

On your behalf, we have already begun mounting a massive effort to preserve your freedom to believe . . . your freedom to live your life according to your Christian faith.

We are pulling out the stops in support of a new bill, the First Amendment Defense Act, introduced by U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) and U.S. Representative Raúl Labrador (R-Idaho), which will safeguard Christians who believe in natural marriage, protecting you from federal government retaliation.

But the Left is pushing back hard.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio) are both being hammered by the Left already, trying to convince them that America is against this.

They've got to hear from YOU. We need an immediate outpouring of response to counter the Left's lies and distortions. These leaders need to hear what you think, not just what the Left is telling them.

As Senator Lee, co-author of the bill, has said, "America is inhabited by peace-loving men and women who want to be able to live and worship and believe as they see fit, who want to be able to do so free of any retaliation by their government based on their religious beliefs."

Your generous donation will help us press this battle and win—and continue all of our critically important work on your behalf, on the Hill and across the nation.

This can't wait. Clearly we must stand for the protection of your fundamental freedoms—and we will.

  • The First Amendment Defense Act is a common-sense measure that will prevent the federal government from penalizing you simply because you hold to the biblical view of marriage! It simply holds the government to the same standard that we hold people to in a pluralistic society: Respect each other's genuinely held religious beliefs.
  • This bill will prohibit the federal government from penalizing persons for their personal moral or religious beliefs in natural marriage in federal employment, grants, contracts, tax treatment, and other programs.
  • And it protects individuals and organizations that believe, teach, or establish in codes of conduct that sexual intimacy is reserved for natural marriage.

Please respond quickly. We've been meeting with scores of Members of Congress and their staffers on the Hill, and as a result, this bill has momentum in Congress. At last count, 145 Representatives and 36 Senators have already agreed to cosponsor this crucial legislation. Even the powerful, conservative Republican Study Committee has thrown its influential support behind the bill.

All of this tells me one thing: If we take strong action together now, we can win.

I urge you to give as generously as possible to keep FRC Action's work going strongly across the board. Our fiscal year closes soon—on September 30—and we need a total of $350,000 by then in order to keep advancing the cause of faith and freedom, representing your values in Washington and across the nation.

Please let me hear from you quickly! Thank you in advance. And may God bless you.

Standing (Eph. 6:13),

Tony Perkins

P.S. "God is not looking for a lot of people," a friend of mine said on the day of the Supreme Court ruling. "He's looking for a faithful people." And those faithful people have an important mission: showing the love of Christ by speaking the truth of Christ.

This is not the end of the struggle for marriage; it is the beginning of the fight for freedom. Make your voice heard. Give generously. Thank you again.

FRC Action is a tax-exempt corporation under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. Financial contributions to FRC Action are not tax-deductible.


A little history...

Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood in 1921. It was known as the birth Control League. The organization got it's name of Planned Parenthood in 1942.

She was an outspoken socialist and admired Adolph Hitler's master race philosophy.

Read more about her by clicking on the picture.

She is fondly admired by Hillary Clinton.

Is it a coincidence that most Planned Parenthood Clinics are located in African- American communities?

Is it a coincidence that more abortions are performed on African-Americans than any other group?

Is Planned Parenthood carrying out the vision of it's founder, Margaret Sanger?






New York needs to mobilize to defeat this egregious violation of religious freedoms. By eliminating the religious exemption to vaccines, S6017would effectively mandate vaccination for virtually all students in New York.

S6017 was introduced by Senator Brad Holyman (D) District 27 on July 15, 2015 and referred to the rules committee. As the NY legislature is not in session, this bill will not move until after Jan 1, 2016, but the bill is active. With the legislature out of session and lawmakers not as busy, this is the PERFECT time to contact your legislators and kill this bill. In New Jersey when a similar bill was introduced this session, lawmakers were bombarded with messages and calls from constituents opposed to the bill, and the bill was stopped. Let’s bombard them and stop this before it gets going.


Call, email and meet with your Assembly member and Senator and ask them to OPPOSE S6017. Be sure to include your name and address and write OPPOSE S6017 in the subject line.

1.Contact your New York State Senator and Assembly Member by phone and email and ask them to OPPOSE S6017. 
Find your New State Senator : http://www.nysenate.gov/senators
Find your Assembly Member : http://assembly.state.ny.us/mem/search/

2.Contact the sponsor, the senate majority leader, the senate coalition leader and the speaker of the assembly and tell them you are opposed to removing the religious belief exemption to vaccination in New York, S6017.

Sponsor: Senator Brad Hoylman, (212) 633-8052, (518) 455-2451http://www.nysenate.gov/senator/brad-hoylman/contact

Senate Majority Leader John Flanagan, (631) 361-2154, (518) 455-2071 -http://www.nysenate.gov/senator/john-j-flanagan/contact

Senate Coalition Leader Jeffrey Klein, (718) 822-2049, (518) 455-3595 -http://www.nysenate.gov/senator/jeffrey-d-klein/contact

Speaker of the Assembly Carl Heastie, (718) 654-6539, (518) 455-3791 -http://assembly.state.ny.us/mem/Carl-E-Heastie/

Anyone who wants to be on the BRRTLC mailing list to GET pre-addressed
ACTION postcards should fill out the form for the mailing list shown on line and MAIL to the PO box ..

For information call Buffalo Regional Right to Life Committee at 852-3028

Or write   BRRTLC,   P.O. 271,  Buffalo, NY  14240

Assemblymen Sean Ryan and Crystal Peoples voted for a bill to approve late term and partial birth abortion. Will Senator Tim Kennedy also vote for this legalized murder? Do these people really represent the majority conscience of this community?

NY Assembly Okays Abortion During All Nine Months

April 07, 2015 by Laurel Recsetar
The New York State Assembly approved a bill that would codify a “right” to third trimester abortions. Right now, NY law does not specifically allow third trimester abortions, except when necessary to save the life of the mother. (Of course, we know from the Dublin Declaration that there are never cases where direct abortion is medically “necessary.”)

AB6221 adds a new “health” exception, stating that anything “relevant to the well-being of the patient” – including physical, emotional, psychological, and familial factors, and the mother’s age – is grounds for abortion. In other words, pretty much any reason at all.

For some indefensible reason, anti-lifers like to make a distinction between inside and outside the birth canal. Killing an unborn child inside the womb is just as much infanticide as killing a child outside the womb. We know that, but anti-lifers somehow don’t. 
Someone please logically explain why an unborn child who is one day away from his due date can be shot in the heart with poison, but a new born baby can’t?  Unless they want to explicitly defend infanticide, anti-lifers have some explaining to do.

Lori Kehoe, New York State Right to Life Director, told the Christian Post, “It is ridiculous that in 2015, with all the technology at our disposal, we are still arguing whether or not an eight month old baby in the womb deserves protection. It is doubtful that our descendants will look kindly upon this period in our history, when we fought for the right to dismember babies weeks, days and even minutes before birth.”

Unfortunately, this “health” exception already exists in every state. Doe v. Bolton, the companion case to Roe v. Wade, has a health exception that is so broad and vague it essentially allows abortion through all nine months of pregnancy.

Assembly member Deborah Glick, a chief sponsor of the bill, says “It guarantees a woman’s life and health can be protected.” Actually, what this bill guarantees is that New York would allow killing babies at any time during pregnancy, even if the Supreme Court overturned Roe. 

Oh, and a side note to proponents of abortion who think access to abortion “empowers pregnant women” by giving them control over their reproductive systems: It doesn’t. It empowers doctors. What if a woman wants to keep her baby, but her doctor decides that her well-being is endangered by the pregnancy? In the eyes of the law, women do not determine the status of their own health or well-being, doctors do. Consequently, legal reproductive “rights” only give women a fleeting sense of choice…so long as their doctors agree with them.

It will be difficult for this bill to pass the Senate. But even if it fails this time, abortion lobbyists will consider the defeat only temporary. They will try again.

Josh Craddock, a spokesperson for Personhood USA, tells Prolife.Buzz, “It’s sad that in the abortion capital of the world, New York City, Democratic lawmakers are trying to increase the number of abortions later and later in pregnancy. Abortion always kills a human being, no matter what stage of pregnancy it is performed in.”
New York abortion lobbyists are pushing hard to pass Roe-like legislation at the state level. Why would they make such an effort, especially in a state as liberal as New York? They wouldn’t, unless they had a very real fear of seeing Roe overturned. Let their fear encourage pro-lifers that the fight is not in vain, and the defeat in Roe is indeed temporary.

If You see something, Say something !

Write your legislator...

“Capital Punishment” Method for Unborn Babies

Just when you thought abortion procedures couldn’t be any more debased…

New York legislators are trying to legalize a new abortion method that will make sure unborn children are given the same kind of treatment as death row inmates.

Ironically, what New York is trying to do to unborn children would be seen as “cruel and unusual punishment” for even the most despicable criminals. And, in fact, New York does not allow capital punishment for prisoners.

Unborn babies, on the other hand, are fair game.

How ironic and how unfortunate.

Lifenews reports:

The New York state Assembly proved that promoting the best interest of women doesn’t include pushing late-term abortions.

For years, the state legislature has been embroiled in a mulch-year battle over a package of bills designed to push the interests of women. The bills have been held up in part because it includes a measure that would promote late-term abortions in the Empire State. Despite strenuous support from pro-abortion Gov. Andrew Cuomo, the legislature has refused to pass the package of bills because of the abortion measure.

The abortion bill would allow an abortion procedure that has abortionists shooting poison through the hearts of unborn children to kill them.

Now, the state Assembly has approved part of the package of bills — specifically the abortion promotion measure Governor Cuomo strenuously supports.

Today in a vote of 94-49 the New York State Assembly approved passage of AB 6221, the extreme stand-alone 10th point from the previously packaged 10-point Women’s Equality Act, which would expand third-trimester abortions and allow non-doctors to perform abortions. Since 2013, abortion advocates have been holding the Women’s Equality Act hostage to this single dangerous bill, refusing to break the 10-point bill up. This session, however, the will of the voters was finally heard, and the stand-alone bills have been considered.

“Expanding cruel and brutal third-trimester abortions has long been a goal of the anti-life lobby who never met an abortion they didn’t like,” said Lori Kehoe, New York State Right to Life executive director. “With no regard for the fully developed unborn baby who is violently dismembered, or otherwise killed, the New York State Assembly once again put the abortion lobby above New York State women and their children.”

AB 6221, sponsored by Assemblywoman Glick, would change existing New York State law, which currently allows for abortion in the third trimester when the mother’s life is in danger, to allow abortion on-demand throughout all nine months. The law would be changed to allow abortion for any reason deemed “relevant to the well-being of the patient” including physical, emotional, psychological, and familial factors, and the mother’s age.

AB 6221 has no interest in the life of the living, developed, unborn human child, stripping away any protections the smallest members of our human family have.

“We now look once again to the Senate to hold the line in defense of the children which happens to also be in accordance with the will of the rest of the people,” added Kehoe. “It is ridiculous that in 2015, with all the technology at our disposal, we are still arguing whether or not an eight month old baby in the womb deserves protection. It is doubtful that our descendants will look kindly upon this period in our history, when we fought for the right to dismember babies weeks, days and even minutes before birth.”

For those who are paying attention, they will notice one thing about these kinds of procedures and their ramifications.

The dehumanizing nature of abortion is pushing humanity into a new dark age.

This kind of barbarism is spoken against in the Bible and other religious texts, and shows exactly what kind of ruin awaits us.

In a world where unborn children — fully functioning humans — can be tossed away like trash, it’s not a stretch to say all will be treated as such.

While the world might be less violent than it was a century ago, it’s certainly not any less murderous… is it?


Are you concerned that you will be paying for abortion through the new  ObamaCare Health plans?

The Government Health Plan was deliberately written in a confusing complex manner so that the average citizen
(who was considered too stupid to understand it), would not know exactly what was in it.

It was a pack of lies from the get-go. "You could keep your plan..., you could keep your doctor..., your cost would drop.. etc,etc.

It was passed without being read.
Thank your congressman for that one.

But, now you can find out if you will be paying for abortion in your new plan.

Go to this new website:


Don't let the White House kill babies with your money.

Traditional Marriage is under attack in our country.

Click here to say a Prayer for Marriage...

Click here to review
the many stories that we reported on during 2011-2014

Buffalo Regional RIght to Life Committee, Inc.. operates as a non profit organization organized under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions to Buffalo Regional RIght to Life Committee , Inc. are not deductible as charitable contributions for income tax purposes.

ebHosting and Co-location by Cybermill, Inc